80% of Androids Are Vulnerable to Linux TCP Flaw. But I Don’t Care!

Researchers from the University of California, Riverside, and the U.S. Army Research Laboratory have found an off-path TCP vulnerability[[1] that affects more than 80% of Android mobile devices. Unlike a Man-in-The-Middle attack, you don't need to be in the middle of the communication to get hacked - all attackers need to know is who you communicate with.

The vulnerability has already existed for over four years. Attacks which exploit this vulnerability have a remarkably high successful rate, between 88% and 97%, and it can take less than a minute to complete. While you might not be interested in the technical details, you should know such attack can prevent you from communicating with the server using HTTPS protocol. Attackers can completely alter the data by manipulating all responses and requests in HTTP connections.

You also want to know that the majority of Android devices will never be updated. The vulnerability remains active for years. Based on Google Play statistics[[2], more than 65% of active Android operating systems are older than two years, and more than 22% of active Android operating systems are older than three years).

It only takes one vulnerable party to trigger a successful attack and prevent server operators from doing anything about it. The vulnerability remains in the system without requiring any interaction from the users. What a perfect attack method - no user activity is necessary as opposed to a Man-in-The-Middle attack. You can't fix this security issue without updating your mobile device. The attackers only need to choose their victims.

Bad news for all application operators and providers.

Is there a solution that can fix this issue and relieve the worry about the security and availability of mobile applications? Of course, there is.

First of all, HTTP protocol is dying, as it should be. If you are serious about the mobile app that you're owning or developing, you should not use HTTP protocol, and instead, implement HTTPS. But that’s easier said than done. Configuring HTTPS properly is not a trivial task. You don't think so? Look at how many mobile apps, including ones with millions of active users, that don't have a proper validation mechanism of server certificates.

Even if you avoid HTTP protocol, and you implement HTTPS by-the-book, you are still at risk of not being able to communicate with the server due to this TCP flaw.

Software Defined Network (SDN) to the rescue

There is a workaround[3], but it applies only to the server side of the connection while leaving the client side vulnerable. One vulnerable component is enough for attackers. The only way to deal with the vulnerability at the mobile operating system side is to use a “higher network logic” to completely bypass the fragile network connection. There is a name for this solution - Software Defined Network (SDN). SDN should be appended to your application to enable advanced control over the connection without root access to the operating system.

The right SDN technology is smarter than your standard connection. Typically, an application is fully reliant on the operating system to control the hardware of the phone. The operating system negotiates the connection via a network driver. If the vulnerability is in the operating system core or in the network driver (as in this specific case), you cannot recover from the error. Your application remains stuck in this broken network state.

However, with additional network logic- that is, SDN logic- you can detect network problems and respond promptly. SDN only closes the stuck/broken connection, and immediately opens a new one without the users even notice it. Thanks to SDN functionalities, your mobile apps can then quickly recover.

To sum it up, I don’t care about this TCP vulnerability. I don’t use HTTP. I use SDN to handle and secure all network requests. Disconnection on the lower level is not something that makes me go crazy.

I don't care because I’m prepared. Waiting for Android to be fully safe is a waste of time.

If you have any question, contact us.

Reference

  1. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity16/sec16_paper_cao.pdf
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)#Platform_usage
  3. http://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-tcp-flaw-lets-anyone-hijack-internet-traffic/

About the Author

Jiri Kohout

TeskaLabs’ VP of Application Security, Jiri Kohout, brings years of experience in ICT security, having served as the Chief Information Security Officer for the Ministry of Justice and Chief Information Officer for Prague Municipal Court. He cooperated with the Czech National Security Agency to prepare the Czech Republic cyber security law.


TurboCat.io

Data encryption tool for GDPR

More information


You Might Be Interested in Reading These Articles

Key Areas and Best Practices to Focus for Mobile API Security

With APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) becoming a crucial factor in any web or mobile application, security feels more like a journey than a destination. Of all the constituents that encompass an application, API gateway offers easy access points for a hacker to break in and steal your data. A single error in API can cause immense problems for any organization using your API.

Continue reading ...

security mobile development

Published on November 22, 2016

Apple's Zero-Day Security Flaws on iOS, OS X Let Hackers Steal User Passwords

To show Apple a flaw in their environment, a team of University researchers created a malware app and uploaded it to the App Store. This malware can steal passwords from installed apps, email clients, and Google's Chrome web browser. By exploiting this flaw, hackers can bypass the App Store security check using this hacking app.

Continue reading ...

mobile security iOS

Published on July 28, 2015

The Top 5 Mobile Application Security Issues You Need to Address When Developing Mobile Applications

Most recently, a lot of established companies like Snapchat, Starbucks, Target, Home Depot, etc. have been through a PR disaster. Do you know why? Simply because some attackers out there found flaws in their mobile apps and could exploit them. In fact, by the end of this year, 75% of mobile apps will fail basic security tests.

Continue reading ...

mobile security

Published on November 03, 2015